Nobody's Talking About This Dianna Russini Investigation Still Being Open, And That's a Problem

Alright, Seattle faithful, let's talk about something that's been dragging on longer than a 16-inning Mariners game, and it's got us scratching our heads. Remember all the drama around former NFL reporter Dianna Russini and The Athletic? You know, the whole internal investigation thing that kicked off when she resigned? Well, get this: that probe is *still ongoing* as of June 18, 2026. What in the world is taking so long here?

The Backstory: Denials, Photos, and Resignations

It feels like ages ago, but Russini actually resigned from her Senior NFL Insider role more than two months ago. The Athletic had launched an investigation into her relationship with Patriots coach Mike Vrabel. This whole mess blew up after photos of the two of them at an Arizona resort hit the New York Post in early April. Initially, both Russini and Vrabel flat-out denied any personal relationship. We've all seen that play before, right? But then, the Post dropped *more* photos and Vrabel made some public comments that, let's just say, completely contradicted those initial denials. It was a whole thing.

What's Taking So Long? And What's the Real Scope?

Last week, the Post actually reported that The Athletic's internal investigation

Trade on Every Game with Kalshi

Click Here to sign up to Kalshi — Free $10 when you sign up using our link or use code: ONTAPSEA. The only federally regulated prediction market in the US. Trade on real sports outcomes. Available in all 50 states.

was "a few weeks away" from resolution. A few weeks! Now, Michael McCarthy from Front Office Sports comes out with the update that it's "still ongoing." Come on, people, give us some answers! What's the hold-up? McCarthy also added this "reminder" that the investigation is "limited to the former Senior NFL Insider’s journalism for The Athletic, not her conduct." But here's where it gets murky. The editorial guidelines for reporters at The Athletic and its parent company, the New York Times, are super clear: "When reporting and writing stories we do not have an agenda and it is important that our readers understand that." If that's the standard, it's pretty tough to separate a reporter's journalism from their conduct. Based on those very guidelines, it seems likely the investigation touches on both journalism *and* conduct, despite the "reminder." So, what's the actual truth? This whole situation has been hanging out there for way too long. As fans, we crave clarity and honesty, whether it's about a questionable call on the field or an internal investigation involving a high-profile reporter. The continued lack of resolution on this Dianna Russini investigation is just wild, and it definitely feels like it's getting harder to ignore. We'll be keeping our eyes peeled for any actual news on this front, because we need some answers.

This article was created with AI assistance and reviewed by Seattle On Tap editorial staff. Always verify information with official team sources.