Fifteen College Hoops Players Filed a Lawsuit Against the NCAA: Their Whole 2026-27 Season Hangs in the Balance

Can you believe what's going down in college basketball right now? Seriously, it's wild! We've got Xavier's Filip Borovicanin and Cincinnati's MJ Collins leading a group of fifteen athletes who just slapped the NCAA with a lawsuit. These guys, and thirteen other players, are fighting the NCAA's freshly approved age-based eligibility model, and it could totally reshape how players get on the court for the 2026-27 season. This isn't just a minor squabble, folks, this is about players potentially losing their shot to play, and the stakes couldn't be higher.

What's the Deal with This Lawsuit?

So, these fifteen athletes, all based in Ohio, are asking the court for an injunction. What does that mean? They want the court to stop the NCAA from blocking them from playing Division I basketball in the 2026-27 season. Why would they be blocked? Because, under the new rule, the NCAA says they've already competed in four seasons. Think about that: you put in the work, you train, you dream, and then a new rule could just sideline you. Attorneys Darren Heitner and Ryan Downton are the ones fighting for these players. The lawsuit also lists other names like Malik Messina-Moore, Kolby King, Javon Bennett, Chevalier Emery Jr., Jalen Quinn, Savannah White, Donovan Brown, Christian Henry, Ziare Wells, Cristian Carroll, Shawn Phillips Jr., Caden Powell, and Josh Reed. MJ Collins, who played for Utah State last season under new Cincinnati head coach Jerrod Calhoun, is specifically hoping to play for the Bearcats if this injunction goes through.

The Age Rule and The Fight For Fairness

Here's the kicker on this age-based model: your eligibility clock starts

Trade on Every Game with Kalshi

Click Here to sign up to Kalshi — Free $10 when you sign up using our link or use code: ONTAPSEA. The only federally regulated prediction market in the US. Trade on real sports outcomes. Available in all 50 states.

ticking either when you first enroll full-time in college or at the beginning of the academic year after your 19th birthday, whichever comes first. The NCAA Cabinet's decision isn't even final until their meeting wraps up, but the new rules are set to kick in this summer, with 2027 recruits being age-based only. The lawsuit's argument is powerful, stating that NCAA athletes have a "reasonable expectation" to be treated fairly and consistently, no matter their background or high school graduation year. Think about it: 2022 high school grads have been battling it out against older, stronger players who got five, even six, seasons thanks to a COVID-era waiver for those graduating between 2017 and 2020. The NCAA is planning to make this five-year competition rule permanent, with a final vote happening around June 22 or 23, but they're cutting out current college seniors who graduated in 2022 and haven't redshirted. The players say this totally violates the "covenant of good faith and fair dealing" under Ohio law.

What's Next For These Athletes?

The good news is, for athletes already enrolled and with eligibility left after the 2025-26 academic year, they can pick between the new age-based model or the old rules, whatever helps them most. But for these fifteen plaintiffs, securing roster spots for 2026-27 is super urgent. They believe if the court grants them "immediate injunctive relief," they still have a shot to sign scholarship and revenue-sharing agreements, plus those crucial NIL deals, with Division I schools. It's about their future, their careers, and their chance to play the game they love. As fans, all we want is to see these guys on the court, competing. We're gonna be watching this closely, hoping these athletes get the fair shake they're fighting for.

This article was created with AI assistance and reviewed by Seattle On Tap editorial staff. Always verify information with official team sources.