A New NCAA Rule Kicked the Class of '22 to the Curb, And 15 Players Are Suing to Get Their Fifth Season Back

Holy smokes, college basketball fans, are you seeing this?! Less than a full day after the NCAA Division I Cabinet dropped a bombshell new eligibility rule, a crew of 15 college basketball players straight up filed a lawsuit in Ohio state court. They're not messing around, claiming this new age-based model unfairly locks them out of their shot at a fifth season of competition. This is huge, a full-on battle brewing and it just went down in Cincinnati. Get ready, because this is going to be wild.

The NCAA's Wild New Eligibility Bomb

So, what's the deal with this new rule that's got everyone fired up? The NCAA is now saying athletes get five seasons of competition over a five-year stretch. That clock starts ticking either with their full-time enrollment or the academic year after their 19th birthday, whichever hits first. This move practically torches waivers or redshirt years for extended eligibility. Unless you're off on a religious mission, dealing with pregnancy, or on active-duty military service, those extensions? Gone. No more injury waivers, period. But here's the kicker, the part that's got these players ready to rumble: if your eligibility expired by Spring 2026 under the old four-years-in-five model, you ain't getting that fifth year under these new rules, even though they kick in this fall. That's a slap in the face for athletes who graduated high school in 2022, started college ball that fall, and never redshirted. The lawsuit is trying to get temporary and permanent relief to make sure those guys get their fifth year.

This Isn't Just About Playing, It's About NIL!

This fight goes way de

Trade on Every Game with Kalshi

Click Here to sign up to Kalshi — Free $10 when you sign up using our link or use code: ONTAPSEA. The only federally regulated prediction market in the US. Trade on real sports outcomes. Available in all 50 states.

eper than just playing time, folks. Attorneys Ryan Downton and Charles Rittgers, who filed the complaint, hit the nail on the head. They argued that this new rule "unjustifiably restrains their ability to earn money through use of their name, image, and likeness (‘NIL’)" as Division I athletes. That's real money on the line! And get this: more lawsuits like this are expected to pop up in other states. Nine of the plaintiffs either played or plan to play next season at Ohio schools, with the rest having played multiple games in the state. The complaint points out some serious inconsistencies too. These Class of 2022 athletes were out there competing for minutes against older players who got extended eligibility because of the COVID-19 pandemic. But wait, there's more! The NCAA even let 2022 high school grads play a full professional season before enrolling in 2023, and *those* guys aren't excluded from playing in 2026-27. It's a head-scratcher, right? The lawsuit states it plainly: "NCAA athletes have a reasonable expectation that they will be treated fairly by the NCAA and that NCAA rules will be applied consistently, regardless of the athlete’s background before they attend an NCAA school and regardless of the year in which they graduated from high school." They're not fighting the idea of a defined eligibility period or even the five-for-five rule itself, but how the NCAA is applying it, leaving them out while classes from 2017-20 and 2023-25, plus former pros, get that extra year. An NCAA spokesperson was asked for comment, but we're still waiting to hear back. This battle for fairness is just getting started, and you know we'll be watching every twist and turn. Get ready, because college hoops just got a whole lot more interesting.

This article was created with AI assistance and reviewed by Seattle On Tap editorial staff. Always verify information with official team sources.