Gary Neville's "Dictatorship" Jab At FIFA and Why Fans Still Think Breel Embolo Was Offside
Hold up, sports fans. If you thought you’d seen it all when it comes to controversial calls and shady explanations, you clearly weren't watching Switzerland's 1-1 draw with Qatar. We're talking about a penalty, a VAR check that *should* have been totally clear, and then FIFA dropping a bombshell "brief technical outage" excuse for why nobody, and I mean NOBODY, got to see the actual evidence. Yeah, you read that right. The semi-automated offside graphic, the one that’s supposed to make everything crystal clear, just wasn't there. And honestly, it feels like we're all being gaslit.The Goal, The Call, and The Missing Evidence
So here’s the breakdown. Breel Embolo, scoring his 25th goal for his country, put the Swiss ahead from the spot. The penalty came after Mahmud Abunda took down Remo Freuler who was going for Embolo's flick on. Classic penalty situation, right? Except the VAR review confirmed Embolo was onside in the lead-up. Great, technology works, we move on. Only, we didn't. When the VAR confirmed Embolo was onside, there was ZERO onside animation graphic. The very thing designed to show viewers how the decision was made, the actual evidence of the semi-automated offside technology at work, was just gone. Poof! How are we supposed to trust a call when the proof is invisible?FIFA's "Outage" and Neville's Fury
FIFA, of course, had an explanation, issuing an official statement about a "brief technical outage" that "prevented the onside animation graphic from being generated ahead of the penalty in the 14th minute." They quickly added that "The issue was quickly resolved" and the "workflow of the VAR was not affected." Oh, and those magical, unseen lines? They "did not show the attacking player to be in an offside position." Convenient, right? Not for Gary Neville, who was working as a pundit for ITV. He absolutely blew up, likening FIFA to "a dictatorship" for refusing to show the on-screen graphics. Neville was straight-up saying, "Why are they not showing us? They did this in the last tournament." He nailed it when he said, "Fans are already distrusting of FIFA and technology to start with. There is a massive question over that because it is offside in my eyes until they prove me different." That's the heart of it, isn't it? If you're gonna use the tech, show us the tech!What This Means for Trust in the Game
This whole mess just further erodes trust in the officiating process. This semi-automated offside tech, which has been in action in places like Serie A, La Liga, and the Champions League, and even made its FA Cup debut in the fifth round of the 2025/26 season, is supposed to make tight calls easier and more objective. It uses thousands of "surface mesh data points on the bodies of all 22 players" to track their movements. But what's the point of all that fancy tech if FIFA just keeps the results locked behind closed doors when it's convenient? Neville's right, "The idea that they hold this evidence internally and don’t show fans of countries that are playing in tournaments. It’s absolutely ridiculous." For fans like us, who live and breathe every game, we demand transparency. FIFA needs to do better, because right now, they're just fueling the fires of distrust.🐦 What fans are saying on X
See the latest reactions and highlights from Seattle fans about .
🎲 Want to Make Tonight's Game More Interesting?
Kalshi lets you trade on real sports outcomes — not just spreads. It's the only federally regulated prediction market in the US, and it's available right here in Washington state.
New users get a FREE $10 just for signing up — no deposit required to claim it.
👉 Claim Your Free $10 at KalshiDFS Pick'em
📋 Chalkboard: 100% Deposit Match Up to $100 + a Free Square on Your First Entry
Use code ONTAP to lock in this offer.
👉 Double your first deposit on ChalkboardSponsored. Must be 18+. Terms apply.
This article was created with AI assistance and reviewed by Seattle On Tap editorial staff. Always verify information with official team sources.