The NFL's TV Money Gamble: Why Networks Are Happy to Wait Until 2029 and Leave Billions on the Table
Here's the brutal reality for Roger Goodell: the NFL wanted new broadcast deals locked down before this season even started. That's not happening. In fact, it's looking increasingly unlikely that any major partner except CBS will sign early. And according to sports media analysts, that might actually be fine with them.
Right now, the NFL has only pulled CBS into formal negotiations. That deal happened because Skydance's purchase of Paramount last summer triggered a change-in-control clause that basically forced CBS to the table. Fox, NBC, ESPN, and Prime Video? None of them are even talking seriously about new agreements yet. And there's a growing consensus among media insiders that nobody's going to budge until the opt-out windows open after the 2029-30 season (2030-31 for ESPN).
🎲 Want to Make Tonight's Game More Interesting?
Kalshi lets you trade on real sports outcomes — not just spreads. It's the only federally regulated prediction market in the US, and it's available right here in Washington state.
New users get a FREE $10 just for signing up — no deposit required to claim it.
👉 Claim Your Free $10 at KalshiWhy Would Anyone Rush to Spend More?
Andrew Marchand from The Athletic laid out the cold logic on his podcast with John Ourand from Puck. Start with Prime Video. Amazon pays about $1 billion annually for Thursday Night Football, the cheapest package by far. NBC's Sunday Night Football goes for around $2 billion. Yet Prime Video might be getting the best deal in the entire NFL broadcast ecosystem.
"I just think if I'm Amazon, I think they're probably just gonna sit it out and say, 'We'll see you in '29,'" Marchand said. "They have trillions of dollars, they just had a great earnings call, like, why are they in a rush? They have a deal. A deal's a deal. Why are they in a rush to give the NFL more money?"
ESPN is a different beast entirely. The network shells out $2.7 billion per year, more than anyone else. Marchand thinks ESPN will flex that muscle. "If I'm ESPN, I'm paying $2.7 billion, paying the most of anybody, I'm going to Roger Goodell, I'm going to Hans Schroeder, and I'm saying, 'I want the best package. I should have the best games.'" ESPN's opt-out comes a year later than the others, and the NFL owns a 10% stake in the network, which changes the whole dynamic.
Fox and the Antitrust Gamble
Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch used to sound eager about an early renewal. Not anymore. He's publicly stated Fox already pays market price. Meanwhile, Fox and the Murdoch empire have been pushing hard on a narrative: moving NFL games off broadcast TV could threaten the league's antitrust exemption. The Justice Department is now investigating exactly that.
"Fox is sitting there and they do not want to spend that money," Marchand said, noting Fox's smaller market cap compared to its broadcast rivals. "You look at their market cap, it doesn't really make sense for them to spend too much more money."
Bottom line: networks know that media is going to look completely different in four years. They're willing to roll the dice and see what 2029-30 brings.
🐦 What fans are saying on X
See the latest reactions and highlights from Seattle fans about .
View X conversation →DFS Pick'em
🏆 Underdog Fantasy: Play $5, Get $50 in Bonus Entries
Use code ONTAP to lock in this offer.
👉 Claim your $50 bonus on Underdog FantasySponsored. Must be 18+. Terms apply.
This article was created with AI assistance and reviewed by Seattle On Tap editorial staff. Always verify information with official team sources.