Brendan Sorsby Is Banned From the NFL Supplemental Draft, And the League's Reasons Make ZERO Sense

Alright, fam, you are NOT going to believe the latest head-scratcher from the NFL. It feels like every other day the league does something that just makes you throw your hands up, right? Well, they've pulled another one, and this time, it's about quarterback Brendan Sorsby. The NFL has flat-out decided to block him from entering the supplemental draft, and get this: the reasons they're giving for the decision? They arguably have absolutely no backup in the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Seriously, what are we even doing here?

What Happened to Brendan Sorsby?

So, the scoop is the NFL issued a letter explaining their decision, and according to what's out there, those reasons don't jive with the CBA at all. Let's be clear, this isn't some fringe guy we're talking about. Sorsby, a quarterback, actually could have declared for the *regular* 2026 NFL Draft back in April under the "special eligibility" rule, had he decided to skip his remaining college years. He had that path. He chose a different one, presumably because the supplemental draft was an option. Now, the league says "nope," and fans are left scratching their heads wondering why. It’s a move that feels arbitrary, and it definitely leaves a sour taste when you consider how tightly these things are supposed to be regulated.

The CBA Has Our Back, So Why Is The NFL Ignoring It?

This is where it gets wild. The Collective Bargaining Agreement, the very rulebook the league and players agree to, seems pretty darn clear on this. Article 6, Section 2(c) states explicitly, and I quote: "I

Trade on Every Game with Kalshi

Click Here to sign up to Kalshi — Free $10 when you sign up using our link or use code: ONTAPSEA. The only federally regulated prediction market in the US. Trade on real sports outcomes. Available in all 50 states.

f a player who was not eligible for the Draft in any League Year becomes eligible after the date of the Draft, he will be eligible to be selected in a Supplemental Draft, if the League elects to conduct such a Draft, on or before the seventh calendar day prior to the opening of the first training camp that League Year. No player may elect to bypass a Draft for which he is eligible to apply for selection in a Supplemental Draft." What's the key takeaway there? The "test is eligibility, not purity or integrity." It's black and white, folks! We're talking about basic eligibility here. For "special eligibility," a player usually just needs "three NFL regular seasons have begun and ended following either his graduation from high school or graduation of the class with which he entered high school, whichever is earlier." Sorsby clearly met the criteria to be *eligible* for the draft in general. So, if the CBA says eligibility is the only thing that matters, and Sorsby was eligible, why is the NFL suddenly playing judge and jury on "purity" or "integrity"? It feels like the league is making up rules on the fly, and that's just not how you run a professional organization that's supposed to uphold its own agreements. This kind of stuff sets a bad precedent for every single player, every single year. This whole situation is frustrating, to say the least. It's a reminder that even with a clear rulebook, the NFL can sometimes make calls that leave you questioning everything. We'll be watching closely to see if there's any follow-up or clarification, because right now, this decision looks like a straight-up conflict with the very foundation of how players enter the league.

This article was created with AI assistance and reviewed by Seattle On Tap editorial staff. Always verify information with official team sources.